Over the past year and a half, the performance dynamics between the market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 index and its equal-weight counterpart have undergone a notable divergence, the magnitude of which have not been seen for more than 20 years. Historically, such large disparities have often served as precursors to market realignments, presenting astute investors with potential opportunities to capitalize when historically large diversions revert towards historical averages and more sustainable levels.
In fact, over the last two decades, the S&P 500 cap-weighted index has only outperformed the equal-weighted index to this magnitude four times. Since early June, relative performance of the S&P 500 equal weight index compared to the S&P 500 cap-weighted index surpassed a 20-year low.
The relative performance chart above illustrates the comparative performance between the S&P 500, represented by SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), and its equal-weight counterpart, Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). A downward trend in the chart indicates periods when the S&P 500 outperformed the equal-weight index, while an upward trend signifies the opposite. For those less familiar with relative performance charts, this performance disparity can also be observed by plotting both indices on a single, traditional performance chart.
Looking at the last three years of side-by-side performance of the two indices, the tight correlation can be seen quite clearly over shorter time frames. However, over the last 18 months, significant dispersion has occurred opening a nice alligator jaw between the two.
Divergence Explained
The S&P 500, as a cap-weighted index, has witnessed an unprecedented level of concentration, with the top ten constituents accounting for over one-third of the index’s value as of June 21. This phenomenon can be attributed to the relentless buying frenzy surrounding technology and artificial intelligence companies, which have been the primary drivers of the index’s returns over the past year.
While such concentration levels might seem enticing in the short term, history has demonstrated that they are rarely sustainable. Inevitably, momentum reversals occur, resulting in significant pain for overallocated and passive investors. Conversely, this situation presents opportunities for investors willing to bet on a reversion to more sustainable concentration levels through equal-weight exposure or underweighting the largest companies in the index.
Compounding the concentration issue is the significant sector imbalance within the S&P 500. The technology sector, which encompasses many of the top ten stocks, has been the undisputed leader in performance since 2020. However, this dominance has overshadowed potential opportunities in other sectors. Energy and industrials, for example, may be poised for a resurgence in the current economic environment while offering valuable downside protection by virtue of their relatively lower valuations.
While the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 have delivered phenomenal year-to-date performance, with NVIDIA leading the pack, recent weeks have witnessed a potential turning point. Since the beginning of July, the majority of these top performers, with the exception of Berkshire Hathaway, have exhibited downward trajectories, including NVIDIA, which has been the single largest contributor to the S&P 500’s performance.
These early signs of a trend change should not be ignored by investors. While it is essential to avoid fighting strong upward momentum in dominant companies, as such trends can persist longer than anticipated, recognizing potential inflection points can be crucial in capitalizing on emerging opportunities.
Prudent Strategies
As the dispersion between the S&P 500 and its equal-weight counterpart widens, and the concentration levels within the cap-weighted index reach historically unsustainable levels, diversification becomes an increasingly wise strategy. By reallocating a portion of their portfolios to a more diversified basket of stocks, investors can potentially mitigate risks and position themselves for potential outperformance relative to the S&P 500.
In addition to diversification across individual stocks, investors should also consider sector rotation as a means of capitalizing on the evolving market landscape. While the technology sector has been the undisputed leader in recent years, other sectors, such as energy and industrials, may present compelling opportunities as economic conditions shift. By actively monitoring sector performance and adjusting allocations accordingly, investors can potentially enhance their portfolio’s resilience and unlock new avenues for growth.
While the signs of a potential market shift are emerging, timing the transition is crucial. Investors should exercise patience and carefully monitor the performance of the top stocks driving the concentration in the S&P 500. As these behemoths begin to exhibit sustained weakness, it may signal an opportune moment to rebalance portfolios and position for the next phase of the market cycle.
In navigating these market dynamics, risk management should remain a top priority for investors. While capitalizing on potential opportunities is essential, it is equally important to strike a balance between growth and protection. Diversification across sectors, asset classes, and investment strategies can help mitigate risks and ensure that portfolios remain resilient in the face of market volatility.
The divergence between the S&P 500 and its equal-weight counterpart presents investors with an array of opportunities. By embracing diversification and actively monitoring sector dynamics, investors can position themselves advantageously to navigate these shifts and potentially unlock substantial returns.
Patience and careful timing are essential, as is the willingness to adapt to changing market conditions. By combining a strategic mindset with a disciplined approach, investors can navigate the complexities of the market and capitalize on a broadening rally in stocks.
Read the full article here
